Re: 3.1.6 vs. 3.2.0b5 speed test results

Lachlan Andrew <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.htdig.devel
Organization sourceforge
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Greetings Ted,

Thanks for your test.  I'm both pleased and puzzled by the results...  
My guess is that there is something about your particular set-up 
which is different from the default.  Could you post your  htdig.conf  
file (with any sensitive details removed)?  That may help us to track 
down the source of the problem.  It certainly adds weight to Neal's 
belief that it is just a bug, not a fundamental database problem, 
which is very encouraging.

Thanks,
Lachlan

On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 07:00 pm, Ted Stresen-Reuter wrote:
> It appears that 3.2.0b5 is about 20%
> faster than 3.1.6 at digging (indexing) a site on Mac OS X
> (10.3.4).
>
> I hope this helps with the pending decision.

-- 
[email protected]
ht://Dig developer DownUnder  (http://www.htdig.org)



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X.
From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the one
installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and
evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504
_______________________________________________
ht://Dig Developer mailing list:
[email protected]
List information (subscribe/unsubscribe, etc.)
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-dev
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.