Re: [links] javascript support in links, what does it mean?

On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 08:02:39PM +0100, Vedran LjuboviÄ? wrote:
> On Saturday 06 November 2004 16:15, Chris Green wrote:
> > > Links support for ECMAscript leaves a lot to be desired. I've seen it die
> > > inside a comment.
> > >
> > > Would you like to help me fix it?
> >
> > Maybe, what do you mean?  I'm quite happy to be a tester/debugger if
> > that's what you mean.  I can even program in C/C++.
> 
> Well I guess I just like to know that I'm not alone on this ;) 
> I was active on the links-hacked project. In the past few days there are other 
> activities that overwhelmed me, some of which put the bread on my table, but 
> I plan on restarting the work soon. The first thing I plan to do is add an 
> option to "Resume on errors" (e.g. just stop execution but don't disable 
> events). This should help with many such cases. I could use help from 
> experienced C coders cause I too am just learning.
> 
> Please don't think this as an insult but... are you sure you used 
> --enable-javascript when compiling?
> 
Yes, I'm pretty certain I did! :-)  (It's a sensible question though)
My terminal history confirms this, I'm amazed it's still there but:-

    x-1$ h | grep enable
      472  ./configure --prefix=$HOME --enable-javascript --without-x

('h' is aliased to 'history')


I'm (hopefully) an "experienced C coder", I've been writing in C since
the 1980s.  It's how I earn my living still, though I also write C++
and Java nowadays.

-- 
Chris Green ([email protected])

    "Never ascribe to malice, that which can be explained by incompetence."
_______________________________________________
Links-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/links-list