Re: Inconsistency with dhandlers

On May 21, 2004, at 1:38 PM, Dave Rolsky wrote:

> Given that there are now two ways of doing this without Mason (re-order
> modules to put mod_dir first, or use Apache::Dir), what's the argument 
> for
> incorporating this into Mason?

The argument is that the way Mason currently behaves is _wrong_. If I 
request /foo, and /foo/dhandler responds, then any relative URLs in 
/foo/dhaneler will use / as the relative base, instead of /foo. The 
solutions I'm proposing are all workarounds. If Mason is going to 
handle directory requests, it needs to do the right thing with them.

I just sent a draft of an FAQ to the mod_perl developers. I'll send it 
here as soon as Geoff et al. point out all my mistakes and I've fixed 
them. :-)

Regards,

David



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. 
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click