Re: Inconsistency with dhandlers
David Wheeler <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.mason.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On May 24, 2004, at 1:35 PM, Jonathan Swartz wrote: > Not sure what you mean - why can't you just include it? Wiki allows > anything. I can include it; it's just directed more at the developers than at users. > The whole answer is long enough, though, that it might warrant its > own page, e.g. HandlingDirectoriesWithDhandlers. Then you can just > link to > that page from the FAQ. Okay. > "Server Configuration" seems most appropriate. "Components" needs to be > broken up anyway. Well, you have the content of each section on its own page (I don't understand how the WIKI TOC stuff works). Would you want this FAQ to have its own section, then, since you're suggesting putting it on a separate page? Thanks, David ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click