Re: Inconsistency with dhandlers

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Wheeler" <[email protected]>
To: "Jonathan Swartz" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Mason Developers" <[email protected]>; "Dave Rolsky"
<[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Mason-devel] Inconsistency with dhandlers


> On May 24, 2004, at 1:35 PM, Jonathan Swartz wrote:
>
> > Not sure what you mean - why can't you just include it? Wiki allows
> > anything.
>
> I can include it; it's just directed more at the developers than at
> users.
>
> > The whole answer is long enough, though, that it might warrant its
> > own page, e.g. HandlingDirectoriesWithDhandlers. Then you can just
> > link to
> > that page from the FAQ.
>
> Okay.
>
> > "Server Configuration" seems most appropriate. "Components" needs to be
> > broken up anyway.
>
> Well, you have the content of each section on its own page (I don't
> understand how the WIKI TOC stuff works). Would you want this FAQ to
> have its own section, then, since you're suggesting putting it on a
> separate page?

No, I mean create a separate wiki page (HandlingDirectoriesWithDhandlers),
but just put a single question/answer in the Server Configuration section
where the answer just summarizes in one or two sentences and points to that
page. If you add an entry to
http://www.masonhq.com/?FAQ:ServerConfiguration, the TOC will update
automatically.

Jon



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. 
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click