Re: autoflush behavior for subrequests

> On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, Jonathan Swartz wrote:
> 
> 
>>cause another "bug" for someone else. So let's not make any changes to
>>subrequest behavior in the stable branch unless they are *completely*
>>uncontroversial, and try to revamp things in the next release. I'm not
>>sure where that leaves your current bugfix (haven't had time to study it
>>closely).
> 
> 
> My bugfix was for the case of _both_ the parent & subrequest having
> autoflush on.  In that case, autoflush didn't happen anyway, which I think
> is a pretty clear bug.  There's also a failing test for parent w/autoflush
> and a subrequest w/out it.  In this case, the subrequest cannot call
> clear_buffer and have it clear anything.  I'm ok with leaving this as is
> in stable.
> 
> If others agree with that, I'd like to release 1.27 soon.
> 

That sounds fine. But please let's not bump into 1.3. :) Start going to 
1.291, 1.292, etc.

Jon




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl