Re: [Fwd: HTML::Mason::ApacheHandler went retroversion]

On Sat, 30 Oct 2004, Dave Rolsky wrote:

> On Fri, 29 Oct 2004, Jesse wrote:
>
>> 
>>> I moved the $VERSION to the top.  Any reason to not release a 1.2701
>>> release?  Or should it just be 1.28?
>> 
>> Keep the version number simple. It confuses too many users.
>
> Well, the only thing is that we're "running" out of version numbers if we 
> want the next big release to be 1.40, as was agreed long ago, because 
> alpha/betas for 1.40 would be released as 1.31-1.39.

Oh wait, that's not what we agreed, is it?

>
> Of course, we could just decide to push it up a tenth if we needed to, I 
> guess.
>
>
> -dave
>
> /*===========================
> VegGuide.Org
> Your guide to all that's veg.
> ===========================*/
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
> Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
> LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Mason-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mason-devel
>


/*===========================
VegGuide.Org
Your guide to all that's veg.
===========================*/


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click