Re: Mason 2.0 thoughts

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Hans Dieter Pearcey wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 09:12:32AM -0500, Dave Rolsky wrote:
>> I think the Template namespace has been more or less claimed by TT,
>> unfortunately. I wouldn't object to leaving the framework pieces under
>> HTML::Mason, however.
>
> Not really.  There are several dists with modules under Template:: that aren't TT:
> * Template-TAL
> * Template-Declare
> * Template-Simple
> (there are more, but three in the last year or so is enough to make my point)

Ah, that's good to know. I still like the idea of a Mason top-level space, 
mostly for vanity purposes. Mason has a lot of name recognition, so I 
think that justifies Mason::Template.


-dave

/*===================================================
VegGuide.Org                        www.BookIRead.com
Your guide to all that's veg.       My book blog
===================================================*/

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/