Re: Mason 2.0 thoughts

Dave Rolsky wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Hans Dieter Pearcey wrote:
<snip>
> Ah, that's good to know. I still like the idea of a Mason top-level space, 
> mostly for vanity purposes. Mason has a lot of name recognition, so I 
> think that justifies Mason::Template.
>

I like that actually. I also like the "Mason" name for the framework itself.

Robert


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/