RE: PROPOSAL: Add Ted Husted as committer
"Schnitzer, Jeff" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.maverick.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> From: Mike Moulton [mailto:[email protected]] > > Your packaging question is a good one, I don't think that has been > discussed in the past. Traditionally all new code was packaged under > 'org.infohazard.maverick' simply because that is mavericks package. > However this has lead to consistency in the api as all current opt > packages are 'org.infohazard.maverick.opt'. > > What do you guys think? FWIW, I'd like to see everything migrated over to net.sf.mav.* eventually. It would be a pretty big PITA though. Not sure how worthwhile it would be to move the core. > Regardless, I think now might be a good time to define some guidelines > for optional packages. Whatever comes from this thread I will note and > write up a documentation amendment. How about getting rid of the opt and just have packages like this: net.sf.mav.formproc.* ? Jeff ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf [INVALID FOOTER]