Re: PROPOSAL: Add Ted Husted as committer

I think someone mentioned recently that it might be time for another 
Maverick release. If nothing else, I've noticed some minor 
inconsistencies in the JavaDocs. (I think the comments still reflect a 
prior release.)

Perhaps we might consider a new Maverick release using the net.sf.mav 
packaging. I'd also be happy to plug the remaining TODOs in the 
documentation, since I need to cover that ground myself anyway.

-Ted.

Mike Moulton wrote:
> Welcome Ted :-)
> 
> Your FormProc enhancements, coupled with opt-formproc sound very 
> promising. I look forward to using it.
> 
> Your packaging question is a good one, I don't think that has been 
> discussed in the past. Traditionally all new code was packaged under 
> 'org.infohazard.maverick' simply because that is mavericks package. 
> However this has lead to consistency in the api as all current opt 
> packages are 'org.infohazard.maverick.opt'.
> 
> What do you guys think?
> 
> Regardless, I think now might be a good time to define some guidelines 
> for optional packages. Whatever comes from this thread I will note and 
> write up a documentation amendment.
> 
> -- Mike
> 
> On Tuesday, September 23, 2003, at 03:31 AM, Ted Husted wrote:
> 
>> Thanks for the votes of support =:0)
>>
>> I have a patch pending with FormProc now that I would like to include 
>> in our opt-formproc extension. I just left a note for Anthon Eden to 
>> see how he felt about it. FormProc caches the original input, and the 
>> patch exposes the list so controls can redisplay the erroneous input.
>>
>> The other enhancement I'd like to make to FormProc, and our extension, 
>> is bidirectional converters. Right now, I can pass a converter a 
>> String like "12/31/2003" and get back a Date (or a validation 
>> message). To close the loop, I'd like to pass the converted a Data and 
>> get back "12/31/2003", without any additional coding.
>>
>> One point I should bring up is the packaging. Since this is new 
>> development, I used net.sf.mav as the package root. I know some of you 
>> have looked the code over, but I wanted to make sure this was all 
>> right with everyone before committing it.
>>
>> -Ted.




-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
[INVALID FOOTER]