[PROPOSAL] Release v2.2.0 of Maverick
"Schnitzer, Jeff" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.maverick.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Yes, definitely worthwhile. My own projects use the latest-and-greatest third-party jars with no ill effect. I'll update the ones in CVS. With that change, is everyone comfortable with a 2.2 release? Jeff Schnitzer [email protected] > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Leftwich [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 4:07 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [Mav-user] Accessing the Command string from the controller - > Correction > > At 10:09 AM 22/03/2003, Schnitzer, Jeff wrote: > > >BTW, I recommend using the CVS copy of Maverick right now - the > >getParams() method has been renamed to getControllerParams(). > > I wonder if it is worthwhile updating some (all?) of the libs in the CVS > as > they are quite old and the newer versions have had significant > enhancement:? > > Has anyone been running Maverick with the latest and greatest jdom, > bean-utils, collections and log4j? Any problems? > > Robert > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! > Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and > the chance of winning an Apple iPod: > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en > [INVALID FOOTER] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and the chance of winning an Apple iPod: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en [INVALID FOOTER]