Re: Jelly Integration

"Eelco Hillenius" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.maverick.general
Message-ID <001401c302bb$24d49f80$01a8a8c0@Eelco>
This is an update.

As Aapo pointed out in a private conversation, the Jelly Servlet (that is
modelled after Velocity Servlet) that is distributed in the standard Jelly
package should function fine. There's no itch for me working out an example
as I am not using nor plan on using Jelly in the near future. I can imagine
it being handy if you develop XML centric apps where you want to have the
option of using pull behaviour, but right now I am very pleased with
Velocity.

Eelco

----- Original Message -----
From: "Schnitzer, Jeff" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 9:28 PM
Subject: RE: [Mav-user] Jelly Integration


> From: Eelco Hillenius [mailto:[email protected]]
>
> As for an example... I don't think a port of friendbook would be
helpfull
> in
> this case. Maybe we should think of something else that shows the
Jelly
> trick. Jeff (and others): would you agree with this?

I'm fine with however you want to approach it.

Jeff


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
[INVALID FOOTER]




-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
[INVALID FOOTER]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.