Re: Jelly Integration
"Eelco Hillenius" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.maverick.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <001401c302bb$24d49f80$01a8a8c0@Eelco> |
This is an update. As Aapo pointed out in a private conversation, the Jelly Servlet (that is modelled after Velocity Servlet) that is distributed in the standard Jelly package should function fine. There's no itch for me working out an example as I am not using nor plan on using Jelly in the near future. I can imagine it being handy if you develop XML centric apps where you want to have the option of using pull behaviour, but right now I am very pleased with Velocity. Eelco ----- Original Message ----- From: "Schnitzer, Jeff" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 9:28 PM Subject: RE: [Mav-user] Jelly Integration > From: Eelco Hillenius [mailto:[email protected]] > > As for an example... I don't think a port of friendbook would be helpfull > in > this case. Maybe we should think of something else that shows the Jelly > trick. Jeff (and others): would you agree with this? I'm fine with however you want to approach it. Jeff ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ [INVALID FOOTER] ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf [INVALID FOOTER]