RE: Jelly Integration

> As Aapo pointed out in a private conversation,
> the Jelly Servlet (that is modelled after Velocity
> Servlet) that is distributed in the standard Jelly
> package should function fine. There's no itch for
> me working out an example as I am not using nor
> plan on using Jelly in the near future. I can
> imagine it being handy if you develop XML centric
> apps where you want to have the option of using
> pull behaviour, but right now I am very pleased
> with Velocity.

You are right. I looked at Jelly integration one day, but I had problems
with it. Mainly the JellyServlet was not working as expected. It looks
like we should give some more time for Jelly to mature.

I don't right now want to spend too much time for it (Jelly) as there is
already very good alternatives that I already have got working with
Maverick (XSLT, Domify, Velocity and Freemarker).

Eelco, should we look back at it when Jelly developers get the version
1.0 released?


Regards
Aapo Laakkonen



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
[INVALID FOOTER]