Re: Jelly Integration

Sure, if there are people interested in it by then...

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Aapo Laakkonen" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2003 10:48 PM
Subject: RE: [Mav-user] Jelly Integration


> > As Aapo pointed out in a private conversation,
> > the Jelly Servlet (that is modelled after Velocity
> > Servlet) that is distributed in the standard Jelly
> > package should function fine. There's no itch for
> > me working out an example as I am not using nor
> > plan on using Jelly in the near future. I can
> > imagine it being handy if you develop XML centric
> > apps where you want to have the option of using
> > pull behaviour, but right now I am very pleased
> > with Velocity.
> 
> You are right. I looked at Jelly integration one day, but I had problems
> with it. Mainly the JellyServlet was not working as expected. It looks
> like we should give some more time for Jelly to mature.
> 
> I don't right now want to spend too much time for it (Jelly) as there is
> already very good alternatives that I already have got working with
> Maverick (XSLT, Domify, Velocity and Freemarker).
> 
> Eelco, should we look back at it when Jelly developers get the version
> 1.0 released?
> 
> 
> Regards
> Aapo Laakkonen
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> [INVALID FOOTER]
> 



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
[INVALID FOOTER]