RE: this is a quiet list...is maverick really as good as u guys say?
"Schnitzer, Jeff" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.maverick.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> From: Butt, Dudley [mailto:[email protected]] > > I'm looking at using either WW or Struts...got anything to help me? > What are you looking for? I would recommend examining the sample applications and seeing if you like the structure (format of the config file, etc). If you're feeling adventurous, create a spike solution in each of the three frameworks. If you're feeling really adventurous, take a look at the framework code itself. They all do basically the same thing - which one does it the way you like? I used both WW and Struts before I gave up and started yet another webapp framework out of frustration. Many of the people using Maverick followed a similar path. I wouldn't let the quiet list discourage you. Maverick is a very mature framework; rather than figuring out how to add new kitchen sinks to the project, we've deliberately decided to keep its scope limited to MVC logic. I would hesitate to call any piece of software "done", but Maverick hasn't needed to change much lately. Jeff Schnitzer [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 [INVALID FOOTER]