Re: this is a quiet list...is maverick really as good as u guys say?

On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 15:21:25 +0200, Butt, Dudley wrote:

> I'm looking at using either WW or Struts...got anything to help me?

I recently deployed my first maverick app and for the most part it's very
simple. One of the really nice features is the ability to apply an xslt as
the configuration file is loaded. My configs look nothing like the final
mav config (I have nested mappings and standard display stuff wrapped on
every call). I all I would say it's light and easy. 

I'd like to more ability to chain commands (and have an outcome stack a
little like ww), but I can understand the reasons they aren't there. 

In short maverick is light and easy. There's very little to learn and it
"just works".

-k.



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
[INVALID FOOTER]