Re: GUID/realm repligard table handling

Torben Nehmer <[email protected]> wrote:

> >> I'm fighting DB inconsistencies right now here,
> > 
> > which ones?
> 
> They came from a change in schemas, nothing for you to worry about right now. (I
> renamed a table).

The most important "issue" in 1.7 branch is the fact that table name should be the same 
as class name. In any other case two class names which uses the same table may trigger 
big problems.

> > Do you have typename column filled for some records?
> 
> "typename"???
> 
> What do you want with that in the repligard table?

I just wanted to check if you have fresh 1.7 branch db installed or old one updated ;)
Since 1.8 we will follow "class name & (gu)id" pair instead of "table & id".
Nohing should be changed on higher levels as all will be done transparently in core.
 
Piotras