tablename/guid vs. classname/guid (was: GUID/realm repligard table handling)
Torben Nehmer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.midgard.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, - --Piotras wrote on 2006-02-07 16:58: >>> Do you have typename column filled for some records? >> >> "typename"??? >> >> What do you want with that in the repligard table? > > I just wanted to check if you have fresh 1.7 branch db installed or old one > updated ;) Since 1.8 we will follow "class name & (gu)id" pair instead of > "table & id". Nohing should be changed on higher levels as all will be done > transparently in core. What do you do if you have more then one type declared for the same table (like openpsa does) IMHO, and I have outlined this more then once, guids should be db object-wise, completly regardless of actual type names. Reasons are the same as ever. Can you give me your reasoning for the class-name strategy please? Live long and Prosper! Torben Nehmer - -- Torben Nehmer, Guenzburg, Bavaria, Germany http://www.nathan-syntronics.de, mailto:[email protected] PGP Public Key: https://www.link-m.de/pgp/t.nehmer.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFD6MU5JPh4Kn6d5FYRAkM3AKCP6/ea2fEh5uGjk5NxzCZ/UWSwagCfdAJg 9L7TdlkWyMy8CSYk5YqoJak= =B6Pj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----