Re: tablename/guid vs. classname/guid (was: GUID/realm repligard table handling)

Torben Nehmer <[email protected]> wrote:

> >> What do you want with that in the repligard table?
> > 
> > I just wanted to check if you have fresh 1.7 branch db installed or old one
> > updated ;) Since 1.8 we will follow "class name & (gu)id" pair instead of
> > "table & id". Nohing should be changed on higher levels as all will be done
> > transparently in core.
> 
> What do you do if you have more then one type declared for the same table (like
> openpsa does)
> 
> IMHO, and I have outlined this more then once, guids should be db object-wise,
> completly regardless of actual type names. Reasons are the same as ever.
> 
> 
> Can you give me your reasoning for the class-name strategy please?

Class name means type name defined in schema.

Piotras