Schema/QB: table:field vs. table.field
Torben Nehmer <[email protected]> Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:37:47 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.midgard.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, in one of the recent lists on this list (I'm too lazy to look up the actual mail now) there was some code example about the QB in respect with metadata and with joined tables, the synatx there was (if I remember right) metadata:fielname vs. tablename.fieldname (or vice versa). Why is there a distinction between these two cases in syntax? Live long and Prosper! Torben Nehmer - -- Torben Nehmer, Guenzburg, Bavaria, Germany http://www.nathan-syntronics.de, mailto:[email protected] PGP Public Key: https://www.link-m.de/pgp/t.nehmer.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFD8MPrJPh4Kn6d5FYRAhHbAJ45oQOiSTpr+qkMpfoLh8az7q1LUQCeOrFC O/7sv6Ubgxt6DiUQJl5lJEY= =S727 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----