Re: Bad example for JURISDICTION? (missing tags?)
Rigo Wenning <[email protected]> Sun, 5 Mar 2006 22:51:55 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.p3p.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | W3C |
| Message-ID | <200603052251.56457@rigo> |
--nextPart2436348.RpU8SssFOV Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Thanks for the feedback, we have taken it into our issues-list and will=20 respond once it is decided.=20 Best,=20 =2D-=20 Rigo Wenning W3C/ERCIM Staff Counsel Privacy Activity Lead mail:[email protected] 2004, Routes des Lucioles http://www.w3.org/ F-06902 Sophia Antipolis Am Sunday 05 March 2006 09:00, sprach [email protected]: > Reading the specification for the JURISDICTION extension (3.3.6.1), it > says that you can have a long description 'recdescr'. > > The example below does not include the long description inside a pair of > <recipient-description> ... </recipient-description> > > You either need to fix the declaration or the example. --nextPart2436348.RpU8SssFOV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEC118CRlGO2Cxp/0RAsczAJ9ZVrPK3JJqSudp/qHueJThjk/RYgCglFQT rwOwh/8aTrxS14JDxBU49vY= =uz3W -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2436348.RpU8SssFOV--