Re: Bad example for JURISDICTION? (missing tags?)

Rigo Wenning <[email protected]> Sun, 5 Mar 2006 22:51:55 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.p3p.devel
Organization W3C
Message-ID <200603052251.56457@rigo>
--nextPart2436348.RpU8SssFOV
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Thanks for the feedback, we have taken it into our issues-list and will=20
respond once it is decided.=20

Best,=20
=2D-=20
Rigo Wenning            W3C/ERCIM
Staff Counsel           Privacy Activity Lead
mail:[email protected]        2004, Routes des Lucioles
http://www.w3.org/      F-06902 Sophia Antipolis

Am Sunday 05 March 2006 09:00, sprach [email protected]:
> Reading the specification for the JURISDICTION extension (3.3.6.1), it
> says that you can have a long description 'recdescr'.
>
> The example below does not include the long description inside a pair of
> <recipient-description> ... </recipient-description>
>
> You either need to fix the declaration or the example.

--nextPart2436348.RpU8SssFOV
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBEC118CRlGO2Cxp/0RAsczAJ9ZVrPK3JJqSudp/qHueJThjk/RYgCglFQT
rwOwh/8aTrxS14JDxBU49vY=
=uz3W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart2436348.RpU8SssFOV--