Re: Wish List

"Joe Panico" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.pixory
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Alon,

> capabilities.  This would have the additional advantage of still
> allowing this `backwards compatible'  functionality to those who 

This is the best argument I've heard yet for the hierarchy. I agree
that supporting the hierarchy, for those who already have
painstakingly organized thousands of pics into a hierarchy, is a good
thing. I will try to make pixory support this, and attempt it
soonerish rather than laterish.  

regards,

joe


--- In [email protected], "Alon :\)" <alonfw@w...> wrote:
> Thanks for the link to the thread below, it is good info to know.  While
> I agree that a hierarchal scheme has its flaws, as you pointed out very
> well, let me play Devil's advocate for a minute.  
>  
> Fact of the matter is that the vast majority of people now have to use a
> hierarchy for 2 reasons. 
>  1) WinFS does not exist yet, hierarchal organization IS the way most
> digital photographers organize their photos 
>  2)  Setting up a database, even by using prepackaged systems like Jasc
> and Adobe Photo Albums, or Pixory when it gets to that level, takes a
> considerable investment of time.  Not only to get it going after you
> have many (in my case thousands) of pictures organized hierarchically,
> but also every time you get more pics.  Hierarchy = 2 minutes to put
> bunches, lets say 50 pics, in a folder.  Database (i.e. tags, keywords,
> descriptions, etc… associated with the image) takes lets say 3 minutes
> per pic x our 50 pics = 150 minutes or 2.5 hours!  I am speaking from
> personal experience as I am slowly working at getting all my pics
> cataloged (databased) via Jasc Photo Album, while IN THE MEANTIME, I can
> still find them easily via my hierarchy.
>  
> I would suggest you use the same philosophy as I have.  As I understand
> it you are working towards setting up a database functionality for
> Pixory (ie keywords),  IN THE MEANTIME it would be very useful for the
> client side to have at least a hierarchal option… seems to me that it
> should not be to hard to add just the option that the client side format
> be the same as the admin side except without the configuration
> capabilities.  This would have the additional advantage of still
> allowing this `backwards compatible'  functionality to those who still
> prefer it over the database structure once that structure is in effect.
> As for me, and I am sure others, even with a database, the hierarchal
> structure will still be useful as a simple, quick, and pre-existing
> organizational scheme, for the same reasons I am using both structures
> in Jasc.  (which, in case anyone cares, is one big reason Jasc is better
> than Adobe)
>  
> From what I can tell, it sounds like you are working towards something
> very much like Jasc or Adobe Album, except web based, which I think
> sounds like the perfect program!!
>  
> As I mentioned earlier, what I am really looking for is a program that I
> can just install and point to my `My Pictures' folder, no more work than
> that, and have it on the web for non technical friends and family to
> look at.  I have found you can do this with tzo fairly well, however the
> drawback of tzo vs. Pixory is Pixory is just more robust, more powerful.
> More specifically, Pixory allows access control and descriptions for
> images, and of course Pixory is free!
>  
> I am sad to report that at this time tzo is the better solution for me
> personally due to 
> 1) the hierarchal structure
> 2) ability to view both pics and subfolders
> 3) public access to all folders.
>  
> I hate to beat a dead horse, but I really think you should consider
> implementing those 3 improvements as an easy interim step until your
> more advanced, functional, and powerful `database' structure is
> implemented.  Off course this all may be a mute point depending on the
> timeframe you are looking at for implementing the database structure,
> however; even in the case the database structure is coming soon, the
> hierarchal structure's `backwards compatibility' for those who prefer it
> over databases and/or use in conjunction with a database for speed (when
> I come home with 50 new pics and don't have the couple of hours to index
> it into my database for the next few weeks) would still be BIG
> advantages.  The exact same advantages that I feel Jasc is superior to
> Adobe, flexabilty to do it the way I WANT, not the way the developer
> thinks I should :-)  No offence intended.
>  
> Don't get me wrong, I think a database structure is the way to go, but
> have the dual functionality is a good thing.
> Don't get me wrong regarding Pixory either, I am just playing Devil's
> Advocate (mostly), I think it is fabulous program with real potential,
> and for many people serves their needs very well just the way it is now.
> Congrats on coming up with a great idea and following through to
> actually make it a reality! 
>  
> One more thing
> Pic filenames on thumbnail page
> Which page are you talking about? The 'Album Index'
> page?
> Ideally it should be an option an all the pages.
>  
> -----Original Message-----
> From: joe panico [mailto:pixory@y...] 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 11:16 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [pixory-beta] Wish List
>  
> Alon,
> 
> > Hey, great program!  Almost exactly what I am
> 
> > 1.  A 'Tree View' for the 'client side' something
> > like what the 
> I'm still holding off on this. Please see this thread
> here:
> HYPERLINK
> "http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pixory-beta/message/237"http://groups.yah
> oo.com/group/pixory-beta/message/237
> 
> Basically, I have a different scheme in mind. If,
> after I introduce that scheme, users are still kicking
> and screeming about hierarchical albums, I'll consider
> it then.
> 
> > 2.  Default all Albums to public access.
> 
> Yes. There will be a mechanism where you can easily
> set this default. It won't be in the next release, but
> hopefully soon after.
> 
> > 3.  Make pics and subfolders viewable (currently
> 
> Same as 1.
> 
> > 4.  Pic filenames on thumbnail page
> Which page are you talking about? The 'Album Index'
> page? 
> 
> regards,
> 
> joe
> 
> --- alonfw2 <alonfw@w...> wrote:
> > Hey, great program!  Almost exactly what I am
> > looking for.  What I 
> > am looking for is a simple program like this that
> > will turn my "My 
> > Pictures" folder into a website 'dynamically', ie I
> > don't have to do 
> > anything but put my pics in the dir.  In light of
> > that I have come 
> > up with the following wish list for Pixor:
> > 
> > 1.  A 'Tree View' for the 'client side' something
> > like what the 
> > admin side has.
> > 2.  Default all Albums to public access.
> > 3.  Make pics and subfolders viewable (currently
> > only subfolders are 
> > viewable, if subfolder exists = no pics viewable)
> > 4.  Pic filenames on thumbnail page
> > 
> > Again, great program!  I have never programmed in
> > Java, but maybe I 
> > could learn and help out?  Just an offer, no
> > interest in making 
> > money or anything, just interested in having the
> > ideal free 
> > software :)
> > 
> > Alon :)
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
> HYPERLINK "http://sbc.yahoo.com"http://sbc.yahoo.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> 
> HYPERLINK
> "http://rd.yahoo.com/M=251812.3170658.4537139.1261774/D=egroupweb/S=1705
> 144708:HM/A=1564416/R=0/SIG=11ti81skc/*http:/www.netflix.com/Default?mqs
> o=60164797&partid=3170658"
> 
>  HYPERLINK
> "http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=251812.3170658.4537139.1261774/D=egrou
> pmail/S=:HM/A=1564416/rand=197625518"
> 
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> [email protected]
> 
> 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the HYPERLINK
> "http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/"Yahoo! Terms of Service. 
> 
> ---
> Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.492 / Virus Database: 291 - Release Date: 6/24/2003
> 
> 
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.492 / Virus Database: 291 - Release Date: 6/24/2003



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get A Free Psychic Reading! Your Online Answer To Life's Important Questions.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Lj3uPC/Me7FAA/ySSFAA/EGnolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.