Re: StackOverflow
"jockmurphy" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.pixory |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
That sounds great. I can understand the need for security, but I do think you need to change this. Most apps come preconfigured with a default account, and quite frankly I think that is sufficent. If you are concerned about security after that, then force them to change the password on the first login. I think you've got a great piece of software here, and I would like to see if it meets my needs. But you really do need to make restritions like this more clear. The other person who helped me (mcaviti, thank you btw), said that the local access restrition was in the documentation, but I could find it no where in the docs that came with the webapp. And erroring out with a StackOverflow, when the app could check for that condition is less than desireable. Mcaviti, said the latest version doesn't do this, but I downloaded the only version there is on the site (3.9). One last question. Does Pixory allow me to cutomize the apprearance of the app? I would like to make it blend in with the style of the resot of my site, so being able to customize it's CSS or templates would be a good thing. I tried looking for something like this while I was using lynx, but didn't find it and easily could have missed it. --- In [email protected], "Joe Panico" <pixory@y...> wrote: > Hola, > > > security reasons? Joe will know ;), but once I knew this > > Yep, it was security. I was worried by the idea that a naive user > could launch Pixory for the first time, fail to configure it, and then > forget about it while leaving it running. Then the Pixory installation > would be a sort-of remote directory browser (not a general browser, > but it would allow you to see any of the supported image file types). > > However, maybe I was a little overzealous? I didn't guess that this > restriction would create so many problems for so many people. In fact, > I'm constantly suprised that so many people run Pixory in their own > app servers-- more people download the app server package than the OSX > package! > > One thing I could do is introduce a java "system property" that would > allow remote setups. This property would default to "don't allow", but > a savvy Pixory user could set it to "allow". Any Pixory user who is > knowledgeable enough to know how to change Java system properties is > knowledgeable enough to accept the security implications of allowing > remote setups ;) > > How does this sound? > > regards, > > joe Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pixory-beta/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/