Re: [Pound Mailing List] Pound Failover

Budiwijaya <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.pound.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I'm using pound with keepalived to achive high availability. Works great.

As a bonus, we can upgrade our box alternately.


On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 6:07 AM, James Bensley <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> How are people achieving fail-over with Pound, in the event the server
> becomes unavailable?
>
> I am thinking of something like keepalived to use VRRP to fail-over to
> a second box if the first one fails (so they share the same public
> IP),
>
> OR
>
> IPVS, again to share the same public.
>
> However, I haven't had a chance to lab up either scenario yet. Are
> people using either of the scenarios, which do they prefer? Or if you
> are doing something else, what are you doing, how is it working out
> for you?
>
> I am primarily after active/passive fail-over, active/active is a luxury
> extra.
>
> Many thanks,
> James.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to [email protected]
> Please contact [email protected] for questions.
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.