Re: [Pound Mailing List] Pound Failover

I have been using Pound, Varnish, Keepalived and Heartbeat in several 
setups over the last couple of years and it works fine.

It becomes more interesting if you mix them all together and try to get 
the documentation in order. :)
VRRPD isn't as userfriendly as Keepalived or Heartbeat if I remember 
correctly but perhaps that has changed over the years.

Martin

On 04/10/2013 02:47 PM, Budiwijaya wrote:
> I'm using pound with keepalived to achive high availability. Works great.
>
> As a bonus, we can upgrade our box alternately.
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 6:07 AM, James Bensley <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     Hi All,
>
>     How are people achieving fail-over with Pound, in the event the server
>     becomes unavailable?
>
>     I am thinking of something like keepalived to use VRRP to fail-over to
>     a second box if the first one fails (so they share the same public
>     IP),
>
>     OR
>
>     IPVS, again to share the same public.
>
>     However, I haven't had a chance to lab up either scenario yet. Are
>     people using either of the scenarios, which do they prefer? Or if you
>     are doing something else, what are you doing, how is it working out
>     for you?
>
>     I am primarily after active/passive fail-over, active/active is a
>     luxury extra.
>
>     Many thanks,
>     James.
>
>     --
>     To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>.
>     Please contact [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> for questions.
>
>


-- 
Tin will never rust or give in but Tin melts directly when heated.