[ ijbswa-Actionsfile feedback-3593145 ] Is it a wise solution

SourceForge.net <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.privoxy.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Actionsfile feedback item #3593145, was opened at 2012-12-06 06:34
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by fabiankeil
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=460288&aid=3593145&group_id=11118

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: filter: page-incorrectly-block
Group: current actionsfile
>Status: Pending
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Mathew Murphy (mat75man)
>Assigned to: Fabian Keil (fabiankeil)
Summary: Is it a wise solution 

Initial Comment:
With sites or search engines that may use the following in the address line or link, Privoxy will block the site or link because of the use of {+block +handle-as-image} like the use of lines below
.ookla.com
.overture.
.*/BurstingPipe/adServer.*
tracking.
[abd-ux-z]*.atdmt.com/
view.atdmt.com/(.*/)?iview/
.doubleclick.net/adi
.[a-vx-z]*.doubleclick.net/(?!(.*/)?ad[ji])
.ad.[a-ik-z][a-oq-z].
.serving-sys.com
serving-sys.com
But I find by taking the above lines and placing them in a action file and using " {+handle-as-empty-document +handle-as-image +filter{webbugs}} " it over comes the block allowing the link or address to be allowed. "I have many more the have this problem"
So my question is it wise or problematic to be using this type of configuration?
 
  

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Fabian Keil (fabiankeil)
Date: 2012-12-06 07:33

Message:
Can you clarify what you mean by "taking the above lines" and what your
expectations were?

Whether or not your type of configuration is wise depends on your goals.

The actions +handle-as-empty-document and +handle-as-image not only
conflict with each other, but they also only affect requests that are
actually blocked:
http://www.privoxy.org/user-manual/actions-file.html#HANDLE-AS-EMPTY-DOCUMENT
http://www.privoxy.org/user-manual/actions-file.html#HANDLE-AS-IMAGE

If you copy the URL patterns to a "{+handle-as-empty-document
+handle-as-image +filter{webbugs}}" section the requests should still be
blocked, but moving them is expected to unblock them.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=460288&aid=3593145&group_id=11118

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial
Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support
Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services
Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.