Re: pipelining setting

Lee <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.privoxy.devel
Message-ID <CAD8GWsvJYPRJerAp-urgb71z2oN5CMbSPVq8QRC_g3Uw=cG4mQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 6/30/13, Fabian Keil <[email protected]> wrote:
> Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> What do you think of changing the name to "allow-pipelining"?
>
> Given that Privoxy still doesn't pipeline outgoing requests I think
> "put up with" is appropriate.

I had a feeling the name reflected your feelings about that parameter :)

>> >> Fabian - is this bit correct?
>> >>
>> >> #  Default value:
>> >> #
>> >> #      None
>> >>
>> >> sure looks like the default is 0
>> >
>> > In the config file "None", "Unset" and "0" currently refer to the same
>> > numeric default value. I wouldn't be opposed to consistently using "0".
>>
>> 0 would be better.  None implies neither 0 or 1
>> Want me to do it?  Changes would be to current/doc/source/p-config.sgml
>> - right?
>
> p-config.sgml is right and I agree that using a numerical default value
> would be more appropriate, so feel free to change it.

I might have gone a bit overboard with the changes.  See
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3614613&group_id=11118&atid=311118

let me know what you'd like changed or how much/little you want committed.

Lee

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.