Re: Leaving SF

Hi all,

 Apparently I replied only to Fabian in my first email, below my answer. In
short I can commit to close one of those issues pretty quickly, but due to
the momentary lack of engineering resources - we're on hiring mode - I
can't do more than that.

 Look forward to hear your opinion, the sooner the better so that I can
start working.

Regards,


Hi Fabian,

 My name is Roberto Galoppini and I am on duty to grow and expand the
SourceForge ecosystem. As Daniel's former manager I was aware of the
on-going discussion, but I must I've lost the last updates since he is not
working for us anymore.

I promise only what I can deliver. The "no-JS editing on tickets" seems key
for you, and I could commit to that by changing our actual priorities.

Let me know if that's enough for you to change your mind and stay with us.
SourceForge has proven by the facts to a number of projects that we care
about our communities, but I need to be pragmatic since our engineering
resources are limited at the present time (we are hiring!).

Hope you understand.

Look forward to hear back from you.

Best regards,



On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Fabian Keil <[email protected]> wrote:

> Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Is SF all that bad?   I just answered one of the privoxy support
> > requests & it looks like it worked even tho the only sites I allowed
> > were sourceforge.net and fsdn.com
>
> I can still reproduce the no-CSS-issue if fonts.googleapis.com:443
> isn't reachable or blocked.
>
> > It would be nice if javascript wasn't required, and if there is an
> > alternative hosting site that doesn't require javascript that would be
> > a strong reason to move.
>
> I was told per private mail that SF could commit to change priorities
> for the "no-JS editing on tickets" and I was asked whether or not that
> was "enough for you to change your mind and stay with us".
>
> In my opinion this would be not enough, but obviously that's not
> the only opinion that matters and if the JavaScript problems were
> actually fixed (which hasn't been promised (yet)) SF would certainly
> look a lot less poorly when we compare it with alternatives before
> finally deciding if we should migrate away from SF.
>
> > As far as privacy goes, the SF privacy statement starts off looking
> > pretty good -  'We self-certify compliance with US-EU Safe Harbor.'
>
> Self-certified compliance with 'US-EU Safe Harbor' looks pretty week
> to me.
>
> > Mr. Hinojosa - since sourceforge.net won't work if fsdn.com is
> > blocked, could you have someone update
> > http://slashdotmedia.com/privacy-statement/ to include what, if any,
> > privacy sf users can expect from fsdn.com?
>
> While that's a good question, I was told that Daniel no longer
> works for SF.
>
> Fabian
>



-- 
Roberto Galoppini
Senior Director of Business Development,
SourceForge
email: [email protected]
skype: r.galoppini



This e- mail message is intended only for the named recipient(s) above. It
may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the
intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail and any attachment(s) is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately
notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and delete the message and any
attachment(s) from your system. Thank you.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.  Get 
unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available.
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs

_______________________________________________
Ijbswa-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ijbswa-developers