Re: First round of comments merging done

will guaraldi wrote:
<snip>
> So...  that's what I mean by "forking" the comments plugin.
> 
> I definitely don't want to refactor the code.  I don't see any good 
> reason to do that and I don't care enough to argue or discuss it.  If 
> other people see a good reason for it and want to refactor it, that's 
> cool--make your own comments plugin.
> 
> I also definitely don't want to turn it into a committee-based project. 
> I'm really only looking to fix my specific needs and figured that while 
> I'm doing that I might as well offer it to the community.
> 
> So, that's where I'm coming from.  If Ted wants to remove the 
> template-stomping, then I have no issues and I will definitely take the 
> path of least resistance because time is really really really precious 
> right now and there are other things to work on.  If Ted decides there's 
> a good reason for the template-stomping and thus keeps it (which is 
> totally fine with me), then I'll maintain my own version and blah blah 
> blah.
> 
> I hope that clears up any misconceptions.
> 
> /will
> 

Fair enough.
I just thought it doesn't make sense to have different comment plugins 
floating arround when 95% of the code is identical. And as Ted is 
working on it anyway maybe the last 5% could me made in a way that makes 
everybody happy.

That's where I'm comming from.

Steven


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/