Re: twisted

will guaraldi <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.pyblosxom.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Blake Winton wrote:
>
>> The second comment tells us we weren't trying hard when doing the 
>> Twisted setup
>
> And indeed, we weren't.  Does anyone on the list have Twisted 
> experience? I've run some other products that run under Twisted, but 
> I've never written any code for it.  And I'm not sure we want to either, 
> if it breaks CGI/mod_python support.  It would be nice if the WSGI layer 
> gave us some reasonably fast Twisted support for free.

My issue (just to clarify) is not that he said we weren't trying hard 
(though, I think that's a bit of a weird way to say what he's probably 
intending), but more that he doesn't offer any advice, insight, links or 
anything after that statement.  I think it's mildly useless.

Just to clarify a bit further, Jack and Philip tend to send to-the-point 
emails that (I think) err on the side of lacking information, but I think 
it's because they're busy and just don't spend the time.  Nothing wrong 
with that necessarily.


>> If not, don't worry.  I sent replies back to both pje and jack and I'll 
>> wait for the replies.
>
> I was thinking of this when I was reading Ian Bicking's presentation from 
> PyCon:
> http://ianbicking.org/docs/pycon2005/wsgi-presentation/slides.html
>
> It looks like WSGI is a way to write our app, and have it "automatically" 
> connect to Twisted or mod_python or CGI, or what have you.  If that's really 
> the way it works, it would make our lives (by which I mean Steven's life) a 
> lot easier, since we could just write the app once, and have the connectors 
> deal with the various backends.

I was on the Web-SIG a while back when they were discussing the early 
stages of WSGI but then I dropped off for whatever reason.  Anyhow, since 
then I haven't followed WSGI at all.  Looking at it now 
(http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0333.html), it might be something we 
should continue re-working the codebase towards.  As you said, it might 
make it much easier to run PyBlosxom on the various web-server/framework 
combinations.

I think I'm going to spend some time cleaning up the web-site a bit and 
building a "this is the list of things we're thinking about doing" series 
of pages that allow for comments.  That will help keep other people who 
aren't on the mailing lists in the loop with what kinds of things we're 
tossing around.

/will


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.