Re: pyblosxom 2.0: entry level caching

On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Will Guaraldi wrote:

> 2. entry-level caching code is part of PyBlosxom core, but should be
>   done as plugins

i like this. the fewer integration points, the better. plus, i'm a big fan of 
our loosely coupled, callback-based plugin interface. we'd need to support 
verify_installation, cb_prepare, etc. for cache plugins, but that's a 
non-issue since we're just adding two callbacks.

when there are multiple cache plugins, we'd need to know the order to call 
them. i assume we'd have a py_cache_plugins config variable that lists them, 
in order?

otherwise, +1 for this.


> I'd also like to add callbacks for index level caching.  This caches the
> results of ``tools.Walk`` (or whatever that turns into), but that'll be
> talked about in another thread (unless you think it's pertinent to this one).

looking forward to this one... :P

-Ryan

--
http://snarfed.org/

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/