Re: pyblosxom 2.0: entry level caching
"Will Guaraldi" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.pyblosxom.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/30/07, Ryan Barrett <pyblosxom-6sb6M7qyT/[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Will Guaraldi wrote: > > it's a small sample set, but none of the pyblosxom users i know use > load_plugins. it'd be nice not to force them to use it just to order their > cache plugins. Oh weird. I thought that users would rather explicitly enable plugins rather than implicitly enable them. Interesting. > this might be moot since the majority of users will probably only have one > cache plugin. if they have multiple, we can require them to set load_plugins, > as you say. it still might be nice to have a separate setting, though. I think this is actually really complex and difficult to do because it requires us to re-order the items in a callback list either during construction or after the list has been built. I agree we should defer this issue until we discover a solution is really needed. If it turns out it is really needed, we'll need a more general solution that can be applied to all callback lists--not just the entrycache ones. /will ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/