Re: Which repository for documentation contributions?

seanh <[email protected]> Mon, 18 Oct 2010 22:27:50 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.pyblosxom.devel
Message-ID <20101018222750.GC20005@sverige>
I think I might have got pointed to the pyblosxom website over the docs
in the pyblosxom source code as the authoritative source at some point,
and that was the beginning of my confusion.

On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 06:12:15PM -0400, will kahn-greene wrote:
> The docs in the pyblosxom-web repository are generated from the source
> files in the pyblosxom repository.  The pyblosxom repository is the
> official central source of all things pyblosxom.
> 
> The pyblosxom-web repository is _solely_ for generating the web-site.
> All documentation about making changes to pyblosxom or the documentation
> talks about the pyblosxom repository.

This is probably fine, but maybe this could be explained in the
gitorious description of the pyblosxom project or in the descriptions of
the repos? Then it would be right there for anyone looking at the
different repos and wondering. I didn't read the pyblosxom docs to find
out how to make changes to them, I just went straight to the gitorious
project to clone it.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download new Adobe(R) Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4
The new Adobe(R) Flex(R) 4 and Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 (formerly 
Flex(R) Builder(TM)) enable the development of rich applications that run
across multiple browsers and platforms. Download your free trials today!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-dev2dev