Re: Which repository for documentation contributions?
seanh <[email protected]> Mon, 18 Oct 2010 22:27:50 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.pyblosxom.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20101018222750.GC20005@sverige> |
I think I might have got pointed to the pyblosxom website over the docs in the pyblosxom source code as the authoritative source at some point, and that was the beginning of my confusion. On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 06:12:15PM -0400, will kahn-greene wrote: > The docs in the pyblosxom-web repository are generated from the source > files in the pyblosxom repository. The pyblosxom repository is the > official central source of all things pyblosxom. > > The pyblosxom-web repository is _solely_ for generating the web-site. > All documentation about making changes to pyblosxom or the documentation > talks about the pyblosxom repository. This is probably fine, but maybe this could be explained in the gitorious description of the pyblosxom project or in the descriptions of the repos? Then it would be right there for anyone looking at the different repos and wondering. I didn't read the pyblosxom docs to find out how to make changes to them, I just went straight to the gitorious project to clone it. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download new Adobe(R) Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 The new Adobe(R) Flex(R) 4 and Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 (formerly Flex(R) Builder(TM)) enable the development of rich applications that run across multiple browsers and platforms. Download your free trials today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-dev2dev