Re: Which repository for documentation contributions?

Write up suggested text and I'll toss it in.

On 10/18/2010 06:27 PM, seanh wrote:
> I think I might have got pointed to the pyblosxom website over the docs
> in the pyblosxom source code as the authoritative source at some point,
> and that was the beginning of my confusion.
> 
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 06:12:15PM -0400, will kahn-greene wrote:
>> The docs in the pyblosxom-web repository are generated from the source
>> files in the pyblosxom repository.  The pyblosxom repository is the
>> official central source of all things pyblosxom.
>>
>> The pyblosxom-web repository is _solely_ for generating the web-site.
>> All documentation about making changes to pyblosxom or the documentation
>> talks about the pyblosxom repository.
> 
> This is probably fine, but maybe this could be explained in the
> gitorious description of the pyblosxom project or in the descriptions of
> the repos? Then it would be right there for anyone looking at the
> different repos and wondering. I didn't read the pyblosxom docs to find
> out how to make changes to them, I just went straight to the gitorious
> project to clone it.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download new Adobe(R) Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4
The new Adobe(R) Flex(R) 4 and Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 (formerly 
Flex(R) Builder(TM)) enable the development of rich applications that run
across multiple browsers and platforms. Download your free trials today!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-dev2dev