Re: Some questions about wbgwiki.py
"Will Guaraldi" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.pyblosxom.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 7/7/07, Chris G <[email protected]> wrote: > I now have wbgwiki.py installed as a plugin and working. > > Is it simply a pystaticfile.py with the addition of 'wiki style' > links? > > Is there anything else different when compared with pystaticfile.py? The plugin doesn't do that much. It's based on pystaticfile, but I rewrote parts of it. In doing that, I added wiki-style links and I renamed it from "static" to "wiki". I also removed the problem of nested directories. I also added some better sanitization code protecting your system from having people view random files... though it's not heavily tested. And I re-wrote the documentation. pystaticfile is 245 lines of code and wbgwiki is 370 lines of code. > Presumably one can have multiple directory levels unlike > pystaticfile.py which assumes all files are in the /static directory. Yes--this is one of the things I fixed. I'm planning to deprecate pystaticfile in favor of wbgwiki, but I want to see how it's received among users and whether there are other changes that should be made. /will ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/