Re: Opinion on pyblosxom

At 19:02 +0800 on 18/03/2003, in message Re: [pyblosxom-users] 
Opinion on pyblosxom, Wari Wahab wrote:
>* Francois Granger ([email protected]) wrote:
>>   From my "not a good enough programer to help" point of view.
>
>Everyone's a programmer, though it may not be in computers :)

Thanks for the detailed explanations.

>  > With some short explanations, I would be pleased to document the ones
>>  I don't know.
>
>Yes, documentation department here is weak, and I'm to blame for it :)

It was not intended as a blame. This is the natural way of things as 
you and Will explains it. And I feel that it is normal. I am just 
willing to help, the little I can.

>  > And, by the way, I'd like to know how to setup posting through web
>  > browser.
>
>the weblog-add.py available in the contrib section
>of the pyblosxom distribution.

It is on this one that I need the two/three words that would get me started.

>  > I think that documentation allow more users to come in and more users
>>  mean more developers (and the other way as well ;-)
>
>I know this. And what's worse, documentation is the hardest part too :)

Well yes it is, that is the reason why I was pushing a litle on that 
side so that it does not lag too much behind ;-)



-- 
Hofstadter's Law :
It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into 
account Hofstadter's Law.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? 
You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. 
What are you waiting for?
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en