Re: Opinion on pyblosxom

At 09:03 -0600 18/03/2003, in message Re: [pyblosxom-users] Opinion 
on pyblosxom, will wrote:
>On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Wari Wahab wrote:
>>
>>  Yes, documentation department here is weak, and I'm to blame for it :)
>
>PyBlosxom development moves along very very fast.  The differences
>between .6 and what's in CVS right now are huge.

Yes, but not so much from the end user perspective...

>That's one of the reasons there's been a lack of documentation.  The
>other reason is that we're all busy programming and having babies and
>silly things like that.

Really silly ;-)
I know, I did three in total. But they now feed and dress themself at least ;-)

>   In this model, documentation comes in the gaps
>when we're not programming--or someone steps up to the plate and becomes
>a documentation person.

I will try to do some of it for the end user _a_little_technically_savvy_.


-- 
Hofstadter's Law :
It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into 
account Hofstadter's Law.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? 
You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. 
What are you waiting for?
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en