Re: Quixote, QP, the future...?

On 3/9/2006 10:19 AM, Graham Fawcett wrote:

> On 3/8/2006 8:59 PM, David Binger wrote:
>
>> There isn't any difference between QP and Quixote with respect
>> to compatibility.  The scgi server used by both uses passfd, which
>> does not run on Windows.
>
> But the protocol doesn't require *forking*, right? It's an 
> implementation detail. Writing a less-efficient but 
> stable-and-semantically-equivalent SCGI implementation for win32 
> shouldn't be a total show-stopper, just a fun weekend challenge for 
> someone. :-).


Oops, replace 'forking' with 'passfd'.  Still true, n'est-ce pas?

Graham