Re: Quixote, QP, the future...?

On Mar 9, 2006, at 10:30 AM, Graham Fawcett wrote:

> On 3/9/2006 10:19 AM, Graham Fawcett wrote:
>
>> On 3/8/2006 8:59 PM, David Binger wrote:
>>
>>> There isn't any difference between QP and Quixote with respect
>>> to compatibility.  The scgi server used by both uses passfd, which
>>> does not run on Windows.
>>
>> But the protocol doesn't require *forking*, right? It's an  
>> implementation detail. Writing a less-efficient but stable-and- 
>> semantically-equivalent SCGI implementation for win32 shouldn't be  
>> a total show-stopper, just a fun weekend challenge for someone. :-).
>
>
> Oops, replace 'forking' with 'passfd'.  Still true, n'est-ce pas?


Right.  Any volunteers?