RE: MessageTest-3G Assertions

"Jonathan Marsh" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.services.description
Message-ID <01be01c756c8$c9b37de0$1501010a@DELLICIOUS>
Changed PUT to DELETE.

Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Youenn Fablet [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 6:26 AM
> To: Jonathan Marsh
> Cc: 'www-ws-desc'
> Subject: Re: MessageTest-3G Assertions
> 
> I agree on GET.
> Having a content-type on PUT seems reasonnable to me.
> I was also thinking that DELETE may not need a content-type.
> What do you think?
>     Youenn
> 
> Jonathan Marsh wrote:
> > I think I agree, and have updated the assertion generator to omit
> assertions
> > about content-type on GET and PUT methods (this isn't a complete fix -
> it
> > doesn't take safety into account, but seems sufficient for the existing
> > tests.)
> >
> > Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com -
> http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com
> >
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Youenn Fablet [mailto:[email protected]]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 6:04 AM
> >> To: Jonathan Marsh
> >> Cc: www-ws-desc
> >> Subject: MessageTest-3G Assertions
> >>
> >> The MessageTest-3G test case bounds some operations to GET and DELETE.
> >> For those operations, the test framework checks that the content-type
> >> header is set to "application/x-www-form-urlencoded".
> >> I am wondering whether we should remove these assertions.
> >> What do you think?
> >> Regards,
> >>     Youenn Fablet
> >>
> >
> >
> >
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.