Re: [Bug 4736] Make RDF available through WSDL-related URIs

Hi, there's progress on this:
I'm in communication with Philippe (sent him a detailed email earlier
this week) to solve this, it seems that we will include RDDL links to
the RDF document for each of the URIs listed below and all the URIs that
are fragment identifiers at these "namespaces".

Best regards,
Jacek

On Sat, 2007-06-23 at 13:19 +0000, [email protected] wrote:
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4736
> 
>            Summary: Make RDF available through WSDL-related URIs
>            Product: WSDL
>            Version: 2.0
>           Platform: All
>                URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-
>                     desc/2007May/0044.html
>         OS/Version: All
>             Status: NEW
>           Severity: normal
>           Priority: P2
>          Component: RDF Mapping
>         AssignedTo: [email protected]
>         ReportedBy: [email protected]
>          QAContact: [email protected]
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> we still have an open issue 289 in the original issues list [1] about
> providing RDF representations of our various namespaces, with excerpts
> from the ontology defined in the RDF mapping. BTW, this may wait until
> after PR, I expect.
> 
> The URIs used in the RDF mapping are now summarized there in App B [2].
> The ontology (wsdl20.rdf) should live at http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl-rdf
> We may consider putting RDF or RDDL at the following other URIs, too:
> 
> MessageExchangePatterns and their labels:
> http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/in-only
> http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/in-opt-out
> http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/in-out
> http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/out-in
> http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/out-only
> http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/out-opt-in
> http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/robust-in-only
> http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/robust-out-only
> 
> SafeInteraction class:
> http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl-extensions
> 
> OperationStyles:
> http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/style/iri
> http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/style/multipart
> http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/style/rpc
> 
> Signature extension:
> http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/rpc
> 
> The bindings:
> http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/http
> http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/soap
> 
> Is there an in-house style for adding RDF to pre-existing namespaces?
>