Future of WSDL2 test-suite, CVS, errata, etc.

"John Kaputin (gmail)" <[email protected]> Tue, 26 Jun 2007 17:07:41 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.services.description
Message-ID <[email protected]>
------=_Part_11766_15022014.1182874061693
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Will the WSDL2 working group's current infrastructure remain in place after
the WS charter expires and the spec goes to Rec? Things like the test suite,
accessible from CVS, the Interop Dashboard, etc, are still useful as we
complete the assertion/validation compliance in Apache Woden.  We probably
want to contribute more assertion test cases to the test suite.  Also,
future WSDL2 implementations can reuse the test suite (perhaps an Eclipse
EMF implementation)..

Any ideas on how/who will handle errata? Is there likely to be some sort of
WSDL2 'maintenance' WG?

thanks,
John Kaputin.

------=_Part_11766_15022014.1182874061693
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Will the WSDL2 working group&#39;s current infrastructure remain in place
after the WS charter expires and the spec goes to Rec? Things like the
test suite, accessible from CVS, the Interop Dashboard, etc, are still
useful as we complete the assertion/validation compliance in Apache
Woden.&nbsp; We probably want to contribute more assertion test cases
to the test suite.&nbsp; Also, future WSDL2 implementations can reuse
the test suite (perhaps an Eclipse EMF implementation)..<br>
<br>
Any ideas on how/who will handle errata? Is there likely to be some sort of WSDL2 &#39;maintenance&#39; WG?<br>
<br>
thanks,<br>
John Kaputin.<br>

------=_Part_11766_15022014.1182874061693--