Re: ATOM representation of search result facets
mike amundsen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.services.rest |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAPW_8m5nF2mpYDyg8PFNvqqLrF5-4xNeEynd=fygJKZAHAQECw@mail.gmail.com> |
agreed, RFC4288.4.3 [1] is rather restrictive, but I think it is possible to do this. and yes, the fact that it is not yet done, proly indicates its limited value. [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4288#section-4.3 mca http://amundsen.com/blog/ http://twitter.com@mamund http://mamund.com/foaf.rdf#me On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Erik Wilde <[email protected]> wrote: > hey mike. > > > On 2012-09-03 21:54 , mike amundsen wrote: > >> It's possible to define a media type identifer that includes some >> optional params that could support signalling additional features. >> I am not aware of any currently registered media types that do this, tho. >> > > so that's some kind of advanced media type registration voodoo, right? my > knowledge about the registration process is probably rather basic, but my > understanding was that parameters have to be defined in the registration, > and they cannot be added separately to an existing registration. maybe the > indirection you're mentioning makes this possible, but if nobody is using > this, it may be a good sign that this mechanism is a little bit more > complex than what most media type authors are after. > > > thanks and cheers, > > dret. > > -- > erik wilde | mailto:[email protected] - tel:+1-510-2061079 | > | UC Berkeley - School of Information (ISchool) | > | http://dret.net/netdret http://twitter.com/dret | >