RE: arch diagrams from the f2f

"Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.services.ws-arch
Message-ID <7FCB5A9F010AAE419A79A54B44F3718E7C9775@bocnte2k3.boc.chevrontexaco.net>
I did at the F2F.  I would like to see a picture in which the sender and the
receiver are separated, so instead of a triangle it is a thing with four
boxes (arranged in whatever topology pleases the author -- I am not a
graphic arts person).  I agree that the triangle is a good start and that
the four box elaboration should not be the FIRST thing a person sees, but I
think a person should see it somewhere.

-----Original Message-----
From: Champion, Mike [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 1:15 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: arch diagrams from the f2f





> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler)
> [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 1:45 PM
> To: 'Mark Jones'; Heather Kreger
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: arch diagrams from the f2f
> 
> 
> 
> I am still concerned that these diagrams seem visually to restrict web 
> services to one messaging pattern.  No matter what the words might say 
> in the text, I think that having pictures that leave this
> impression would not
> be good.

Cn you propose revised pictures that would not leave this erroneous
impression?
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.