RE: arch diagrams from the f2f

Yeah, something like that.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 1:31 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: arch diagrams from the f2f


Here's a simple suggestion.  Have overlapping circles at the Service
Requestor and add an additional arrow from the Service Provider to another
one of these circles.  That would suggest other participants can interact.
Just to throw another fly in that ointment, however, multicast MEPs would
have multiple Service Providers as well.  So maybe we should be symmetric in
the added circles and arrows.

--mark

Mark A. Jones
AT&T Labs
Shannon Laboratory
Room 2A-02
180 Park Ave.
Florham Park, NJ  07932-0971

email: [email protected]
phone: (973) 360-8326
  fax: (973) 236-6453

	From [email protected] Mon Sep 23 14:17 EDT 2002
	X-UIDL: +1P!!=`/!!>bo"!o~H!!
	Delivered-To: [email protected]
	X-Authentication-Warning: mail-pink.research.att.com: postfixfilter
set sender to [email protected] using -f
	Resent-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 14:15:45 -0400 (EDT)
	Resent-Message-Id: <[email protected]>
	From: "Champion, Mike" <[email protected]>
	To: [email protected]
	Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 14:15:20 -0400
	MIME-Version: 1.0
	Subject: RE: arch diagrams from the f2f
	Resent-From: [email protected]
	X-Mailing-List: <[email protected]> archive/latest/2603
	X-Loop: [email protected]
	Resent-Sender: [email protected]
	List-Id: <www-ws-arch.w3.org>
	List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
	List-Unsubscribe:
<mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
	X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests= version=2.20




	> -----Original Message-----
	> From: Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) 
	> [mailto:[email protected]]
	> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 1:45 PM
	> To: 'Mark Jones'; Heather Kreger
	> Cc: [email protected]
	> Subject: RE: arch diagrams from the f2f
	> 
	> 
	> 
	> I am still concerned that these diagrams seem visually to restrict
web
	> services to one messaging pattern.  No matter what the words 
	> might say in
	> the text, I think that having pictures that leave this 
	> impression would not
	> be good.

	Cn you propose revised pictures that would not leave this erroneous
	impression?