RE: XML and SOAP constraints? (was RE: WSA constraints)
"Champion, Mike" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.services.ws-arch |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 4:20 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: XML and SOAP constraints? (was RE: WSA constraints) > > > BPEL4WS layers on WSDL without assuming specific bindings (SOAP or > XML for that matter) and provides a composition (choreography) model > that works just fine. The on-the-wire stuff for BPEL can be > anything .. > and our implementation (on alphaWorks) supports SOAP, Java method > calls and RMI/IIOP as "on-the-wire" serializations. > The WS-Desc WG agreed at the last F2F to not preclude non-XML > bindings. However, we are not planning on doing any non-XML bindings > on our own. Thanks for the clarifications. Interesting ... I'd guess that something along the line of "not preclude non-XML (infoset) definitions and messages, but not actively support them" might be a good way forward for us. > I'm sorry for opening a can of worms. Not at all! This issue has been festering for months, and we need to figure out what to say about it.