Re: Spec draft
"Sanjiva Weerawarana" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.services.ws-arch |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <004c01c26b9d$511567b0$9800a8c0@lankabook2> |
"Ugo Corda" <[email protected]> writes: > - second block of text just below Figure 2, > "The request/response pattern is also often called the remote procedure call > (RPC) oriented interaction style" > > It might often be called that way, but I don't think it's a good idea to > reinforce that belief here. The interaction style, RPC or document, should > be completely orthogonal to the request/response pattern, so that, for > instance, I can have a request/response pattern that uses the document style > instead of RPC. +1 I would personally like to see the WSDL SOAP binding completely change the terminology of "document" vs. "rpc" to attempt to reduce the confusion that request/response == RPC. Sanjiva.