Re: Spec draft
"Christopher B Ferris" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.services.ws-arch |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <OFDF31754B.270920E1-ON85256C48.00435BDC-85256C48.0043C600@rchland.ibm.com> |
+1 Christopher Ferris Architect, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture email: [email protected] phone: +1 508 234 3624 [email protected] wrote on 10/04/2002 07:58:09 AM: > > "Ugo Corda" <[email protected]> writes: > > - second block of text just below Figure 2, > > "The request/response pattern is also often called the remote procedure > call > > (RPC) oriented interaction style" > > > > It might often be called that way, but I don't think it's a good idea to > > reinforce that belief here. The interaction style, RPC or document, should > > be completely orthogonal to the request/response pattern, so that, for > > instance, I can have a request/response pattern that uses the document > style > > instead of RPC. > > +1 > > I would personally like to see the WSDL SOAP binding completely > change the terminology of "document" vs. "rpc" to attempt to > reduce the confusion that request/response == RPC. > > Sanjiva. > >