Re: Spec draft

"Christopher B Ferris" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.services.ws-arch
Message-ID <OFDF31754B.270920E1-ON85256C48.00435BDC-85256C48.0043C600@rchland.ibm.com>
+1

Christopher Ferris
Architect, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
email: [email protected]
phone: +1 508 234 3624

[email protected] wrote on 10/04/2002 07:58:09 AM:

> 
> "Ugo Corda" <[email protected]> writes:
> > - second block of text just below Figure 2,
> > "The request/response pattern is also often called the remote 
procedure
> call
> > (RPC) oriented interaction style"
> >
> > It might often be called that way, but I don't think it's a good idea 
to
> > reinforce that belief here. The interaction style, RPC or document, 
should
> > be completely orthogonal to the request/response pattern, so that, for
> > instance, I can have a request/response pattern that uses the document
> style
> > instead of RPC.
> 
> +1
> 
> I would personally like to see the WSDL SOAP binding completely
> change the terminology of "document" vs. "rpc" to attempt to
> reduce the confusion that request/response == RPC.
> 
> Sanjiva.
> 
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.