Re: Paging vs scrolling - actual research!

Heather Lyons <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.ucd
Message-ID <[email protected]>
>Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 17:57:27 +0000
>To: Avi Harel <[email protected]>
>From: Heather Lyons <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: Paging vs scrolling - actual research!
>
>>====================
>>Interesting, but...
>>
>>In the conclusion, the author writes:
>>
>>"One might have expected that the Scrolling condition may be more time
>>consuming given the users had to click the scroll bar more times to view
>>the entire passage than they did in the Paging (3 clicks) or Full (1
>>click) condition. "
>>
>>I would like to comment that the expectations of the author are based on
>>the wrong assumption,
>>at least when our judgment is based on the theory of multiple mental
>>resources.
>>
>>Reading activity requires mental resources of the type that requires the
>>user's attention, and therefore
>>involves extra load imposed on the user working memory.
>>In contrast, after learning how to use the scroll bar, the user's mental
>>activity is purely psychomotoric,
>>which does not load the working memory. Therefore, scrolling does not
>>compete with reading.
>>On the other hand, navigation by paging requires some extra load on the
>>working memory, for the users
>>need to recall on which page they are and to decide which page to go next.
>>
>>To conclude, in spite of the extra clicks, we might expect that in
>>reading tasks, scrolling  is more convenient and faster
>>than paging.
>>
>>Avi.
>
>The model changes slightly for small screens...
>(around 200 X 300 pixels)
>Users are happy scrolling through about 5 - 7 screens worth of content,
>after that, text becomes unwieldly and it is necessary to divide content
>into pages.
>5-7 screens worth of text/page seemed about right.
-Heather.

    --------------------------------------------------------------
     POSTINGS (in plain text): [email protected]
           SUBSCRIPTION CHANGES:  http://lists.syntagm.co.uk
            (or send email to mailto:[email protected])
    --------------------------------------------------------------
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.